Comments on: Street Trees Now Mandatory for New Development http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/ For residents, new buyers, and the Downtown Brooklyn neighborhood Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:33:02 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Lance http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4451 Lance Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:35:32 +0000 http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/#comment-4451 Ron, a Cambria Suites Hotel will be going up on the parking lot right next to 110 Livingston. Here's a news clipping about it: http://www.brooklyneagle.com/categories/category.php?category_id=5&id=14505 Ron, a Cambria Suites Hotel will be going up on the parking lot right next to 110 Livingston.

Here’s a news clipping about it:
http://www.brooklyneagle.com/categories/category.php?category_id=5&id=14505

]]> By: evil developer http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4450 evil developer Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:30:11 +0000 http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/#comment-4450 ex-nyer is exactly right. DOT made us TAKE OUT trees we had planned for a job i worked on in LIC. the parks dept has too-strict rules as well. they really make it expensive and cumbersome. ex-nyer is exactly right. DOT made us TAKE OUT trees we had planned for a job i worked on in LIC. the parks dept has too-strict rules as well. they really make it expensive and cumbersome.

]]> By: jen http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4448 jen Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:02:41 +0000 http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/#comment-4448 ex-nyer, any amount of more trees is better! ex-nyer, any amount of more trees is better!

]]> By: ron http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4434 ron Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:30:45 +0000 http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/#comment-4434 what hotel is going to be built on livingston? and where? what hotel is going to be built on livingston? and where?

]]> By: ex-nyer http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4431 ex-nyer Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:13:42 +0000 http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/#comment-4431 Most residential developments were planting trees anyway as a requirement of the ZR's Quality Housing program-- now all you have to worry about is following the DOT guidelines and you will see that it won't be that many more trees. Sorry. Most residential developments were planting trees anyway as a requirement of the ZR’s Quality Housing program– now all you have to worry about is following the DOT guidelines and you will see that it won’t be that many more trees. Sorry.

]]> By: Lance http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/comment-page-1/#comment-4429 Lance Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:34:47 +0000 http://www.110livingston.net/2008/03/25/street-trees-now-mandatory-for-new-development/#comment-4429 That *is* great news! I'm guessing this means more trees on Livingston once the hotel next door gets underway. That *is* great news! I’m guessing this means more trees on Livingston once the hotel next door gets underway.

]]>